Abstract
This paper examines creative artefacts as knowledge entities in practice-centred research, exploring their ontological status and epistemological function within academia. It investigates how theoretical frameworks of material agency, performative research, embodied cognition and visual thinking enable analysis of these artefacts as knowledge carriers and epistemological interventions. The paper addresses a critical problem: the distinctive knowledge forms embedded in creative artefacts (material, visual, embodied, performative) communicate not only intellectually but also bodily, engaging kinaesthetic, spatial and sensory understanding; however, these epistemological languages are minoritized in academic discourse and policy. Within academia, the artefact must exist simultaneously in multiple registers - material, conceptual, social, temporal, performative - generating epistemological complexity that exceeds textual representation. While existing scholarship addresses methodological challenges in practice-based research, a gap remains in theorizing the creative artefact as a conjunction of minor epistemologies. The paper addresses this by positioning creative artefacts' ontological and epistemological frameworks as distinct conceptual languages, and framing practice-based knowledge systems as epistemologies in a minor key. The material examined emerges from the design of a postgraduate course, ‘The Creative Artefact in Practice-Centred Research.’ This course explores how creative artefacts can become legible to academic institutions while maintaining an apartness from interpretive structures, and how their knowledge modes, irreducible to textual forms, can be elucidated without epistemological distortion or aesthetic over-determination. The paper contributes to the argument that critical thinking necessarily includes multiple, incommensurable ways of knowing that cannot be subordinated to any single epistemological paradigm.