The WhoIs Protocol as Critical and Creative Practice
However, WhoIs has limitations. The information it offers contains inaccuracies and inconsistencies (Gañán, 2016), and recent supranational privacy legislation, including the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), has restricted the availability of personal registration data. In 2015, ICANN introduced the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) as a replacement for WhoIs, designed to provide more secure access, increased standardisation, improved usability, and greater support for internationalisation (icann.org, 2024). As such, the WhoIs Protocol can be considered an endangered conceptual world within our current algorithmic era.
Critical internet resources such as IP addresses and domain names carry significant “technical, economic, and political implications” (DeNardis, 2009), raising concerns regarding governance, accessibility, and distribution among institutions, nation-states, and commercial actors. The allocation and documentation of these resources within WhoIs provide insight into the global infrastructure of the internet, past and present, while also recalling the “rigidly defined hierarchies” around which networked systems are structured (Galloway, 2004). This presentation outlines creative and critical methods to engage and preserve the WhoIs protocol.